Locals battling to stop flats from being built on a South London ‘beauty spot’ have been dealt a blow after their appeal against a High Court ruling in support of the plans was thrown out.
Residents had hoped to reverse a decision that concluded there were no grounds to overturn Lewisham Council’s approval of 100 social rent homes on the site next to the Sydenham Hill Wood nature reserve.
But last week campaigners found out their application to the Court of Appeal had been rejected.
- READ MORE: No immediate TfL plans for speed cameras on Bexley road following horror crash
Residents had hoped to argue that the City of London Corporation – which owns the site – hadn’t proved the proposed seven-storey apartment block was the least harmful option for the area.
They also claimed that the London Wildlife Trust’s opposition to the development wasn’t taken into account by Lewisham Council because planning officers missed an email.
Campaign group Friends of Mais House – which is named after a former supported living block for the elderly that will be demolished under the planned rebuild – said they were ‘shocked’ their appeal had been refused.
In a post on the group’s fundraising page from September 11, campaigners wrote: “Friends of Mais House are saddened to share the news that the application for appeal has been refused.
This has come as a shock to campaigners and lawyers, who all agree there is a strong case for an appeal.
A meeting is being arranged with the legal team this week.
“While we’re considering our options, we urge supporters to write to your elected representatives and urge them to intervene.
"It’s not too late to stop this massively insensitive and environmentally damaging overdevelopment. We’ll report back further following legal advice.”
In July, High Court judge Mr Justice Fordham dismissed residents’ bid to overrule the council’s approval of the rebuild plans.
He said there was no legal basis to overturn Lewisham’s decision and ordered Helen Kinsey, who brought the case on behalf of campaigners, to pay legal costs of around £5,000 to the council.
Lewisham says the redevelopment of the site on the Sydenham Hill estate will provide homes for some of the 10,000 plus families in need of a council house in the borough.
The City of London Corporation and Lewisham Council will split the planned homes between them.
Lewisham Council originally approved plans for the redevelopment of the site in August 2020.
Campaigners appealed the decision in the High Court and won due to administrative errors made by the council during the planning process.
The council approved almost identical plans for the site a second time in June 2021. Locals launched another bid to overturn the plans in the High Court but were unsuccessful.
Following the ruling, they vowed to take the matter to the Court of Appeal.
Cllr Brenda Dacres, Cabinet Member for Housing Development and Planning, said: “Following the Court of Appeal’s decision, I look forward to seeing this important 100% social housing development progress.
"The development at Mais House will see an empty building and garages replaced with much-needed social homes for families on our housing waiting list, as well as planting more trees, creating a new play space for residents and retaining current green space on the estate.
“With over 10,000 families on our housing waiting list, we sometimes have to take tough decisions to ensure we deliver new social homes and tackle the housing crisis.
"While it is regrettable that we have had to go through this extensive legal process, we can now be confident that the correct decision has been taken.”
Have you got a story for us? You can contact us here.
Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to keep up with all the latest news.
Sign up to our newsletters to get updates sent straight to your inbox.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here