BLOOD and fibres linked to the jacket of one of the men accused of murdering Stephen Lawrence provide "extremely persuasive evidence" that the wearer was involved in the killing, a court has heard.
Fibres expert Roy Green told a jury at the Old Bailey that in his opinion the wearer of a jacket seized from Gary Dobson was involved in the murder itself or had contact with the killer soon afterwards.
He said: "In my opinion the combination of blood, DNA and fibres provide extremely persuasive evidence to link the wearer of the grey jacket to the attack itself or to contact with the perpetrator soon afterwards."
Experts found 16 fibres linked to Dobson's jacket which matched those from three items of Mr Lawrence's clothing.
They also discovered flakes of Mr Lawrence's blood in the evidence bag, one of which had encased two fibres that apparently came from Mr Lawrence's cardigan, and a minute bloodstain on the collar.
Dobson, 36, and David Norris, 35, deny taking part in the gang attack in which Mr Lawrence was killed in Eltham in 1993.
The prosecution argues that tiny amounts of fibre, blood and hair found on clothes seized from their homes prove they were involved in the murder of the 18-year-old student.
The defence says the samples got on to the clothes through contamination during handling and storage.
Mr Green said that if Dobson was not involved in the attack then any transfer of fibres would have to be tertiary - that is, "from the victim to the offender and from the offender to Gary Dobson and from him to the jacket".
He went on: "In my opinion tertiary transfer does not provide a creditable explanation for the textile fibre elements found on the jacket."
The trial continues
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article