This story is part of a series to be published over the coming week following an investigation into Object Builders.
Over the course of more than a month we spoke to former customers and contractors who claim to have been left out of pocket - some to the tune of tens of thousands of pounds.
To read all the stories in this series click here.
A furious customer tracked down the owner of a building company that took his money and then “ghosted” him – but still couldn’t get any answers.
Ray Mo, 38, from Welling, confronted Sidcup businessman Robin Rudland on video, demanding to know why his company Object Limited had taken customers’ money and then cut off all communication.
But Mr Rudland refused to answer Ray’s questions, instead telling him repeatedly that if he wasn’t happy, he should call the police.
He did – and so did at least 18 other people, City of London Police has since confirmed. At least two cases have been assessed by the National Fraud Intelligence Bureau and handed to the Metropolitan Police for further investigation.
Mr Rudland has not been heard from since and did not respond to Newsquest’s approaches for comment.
Ray, his wife and their three children have been in their Welling house for over a decade and wanted to reconfigure their kitchen and utility room to create a kitchen-diner.
They found Object Limited – which traded as Object Builders – through a website called RatedPeople, who helped put potential customers in touch with building firms.
“They sent an individual round to scope the job and give a quote at the beginning of this year,” he said of Object Limited. The firm quoted £16,482.
When Ray asked to be put in touch with a satisfied previous customer, Object introduced him to somebody who said they were a former client. That person sent images of the firm’s alleged work and gave them a good review.
“The following day I agreed to make the deposit payment,” he said. According to an Object Limited receipt shown to Newsquest, Ray paid £5,494.
As soon as he had parted with his money, he alleged, “There was a bit of a turn from, ‘Anything is possible, we can work with you on design, planning and everything’, to all of a sudden there were delays and excuses and ‘No one can come round at the moment, the date will have to be pushed back’.
“The work was due to start at the beginning of April but they called in March to say they couldn’t do that anymore, and then it just kept getting pushed back further and further and further.
“They were trying to delay things with every excuse under the sun, so I started trying to get a refund and kept getting pushed around to different individuals. It felt like a delaying tactic.
“It got to June or July and I couldn’t get hold of them anymore.”
Ray started doing internet searches on the firm and found a Facebook group created by other seemingly abandoned customers.
“I found this group of individuals all saying they hadn’t been able to contact Object Builders and that was when the penny dropped,” he recalled.
Ray looked up the firm on Companies House and found Mr Rudland had initially registered the firm at an address in Sidcup.
He went there and confronted Mr Rudland on video, but the businessman insisted: “It’s nothing to do with me… I’m just down as a name.”
However, he refused to tell Ray who he believed was actually in charge or provide either his own phone number or that of anyone else in charge at Object Limited.
“If you think I’ve done something wrong, call the police,” Mr Rudland said. “I’m not going to get involved in a debate with you because it’s nothing to do with me, alright?”
He added: “If you feel like you’ve been done or whatever, if you feel that way – which is not the case, but I think it’s, everything’s just got out of hand, like – you’re just gonna have to go to the Old Bill. Just go to the police.”
“It was quite horrendous,” Ray said, adding that it was particularly “hard to swallow” because he has worked in bank compliance in Canary Wharf for 16 years.
“I did all the checks on this company,” he said.
Fortunately, Ray contacted his bank, who agreed to repay his losses under the Contingent Reimbursement Model (CRM).
But he has still reported his case to police and said he was speaking publicly to highlight the plight of other customers who haven’t been reimbursed.
“Action Fraud can confirm that it has received 19 reports, which have all been appropriately verified, that were made between 22 July 2024 and 8 August 2024,” said Action Fraud acting director Claire Webb.
RatedPeople said: “We did have this company on our platform. They were active from October 2023 until July 2024. In this time they did not receive any feedback regarding workmanship specifically until their first complaint in July 2024, at which point we reviewed the account and removed them from our platform for not meeting the standards we would expect from a tradesperson on our site.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel