Shoppers in a South London borough have had their faces scanned and compared with a database of suspected criminals.
Police set up a van with facial recognition cameras in Lewisham and another in Catford on Tuesday afternoon (March 26).
The Met claims the technology helps officers to fight crime by identifying criminals. But privacy campaigners have branded the cameras ‘intrusive’ and ineffective compared to other policing methods.
In Lewisham town centre, a van with the technology was parked on the high street with approximately eight officers stationed in pairs around it.
Some members of the public paused to read signs put up by police near the vehicle explaining the cameras. Others asked officers what was happening.
One passerby, Lewisham resident Loveday Cole, seemed unsure what to make of the cameras. He said: “It’s a bit weird. Fair enough they’re using it to catch criminals and we don’t want criminals on the street but it looks a bit weird. When people get used to it, it’s not too much of a problem.
“If you’re not a criminal, you don’t have to worry about it. It’s only if you’re a criminal, you would be thinking oh my gosh. Some people are going to feel like it’s invading their human rights too.”
But Lau Ciocan, who also lives in Lewisham, said he was concerned about the technology being biased and the security of data held by the cameras.
The 41-year-old said: “You have to make sure that this technology is not biased. If you have a biased pool, it cannot recognise Black people’s faces and it might misidentify.
"How can we ensure that bias does not get propagated? How do we ensure the security of it so it’s not hacked?”
Mr Ciocan also made reference to an incident at Notting Hill Carnival in 2017 where a false match resulted in an incorrect arrest.
He added: “Do they run tests [of facial recognition cameras] in other boroughs that are [more] white? Do they do it in non-Black boroughs? What about places like Chelsea or Richmond? That’s my concern.”
According to the 2021 census, 26.8 per cent of people in Lewisham said they were Black, Black British, Black Welsh, Caribbean or African compared to 7.9 per cent of people in Kensington and Chelsea and 1.9 per cent of people in Richmond upon Thames.
The Met has previously used facial recognition cameras in Croydon and Tooting in Wandsworth. Last week the force made 17 arrests following the deployment of the technology in South London.
Liam Shrivastava, chair of Lewisham Council’s safer stronger communities committee, which makes recommendations about police, crime and equalities, said the deployment of cameras was ‘deeply concerning’,
Writing on X, Councillor Shrivastava said: “[Live facial recognition] has serious racial bias and privacy implications, is legally dubious and has never been debated in parliament. Local consultation has been minimal, with elected members notified just two weeks ago.”
Madeleine Stone from Big Brother Watch said: “Everyone wants dangerous criminals off the street, but papering over the cracks of a creaking policing system with intrusive and Orwellian surveillance technology is not the solution.
“Rather than actively pursuing people who pose a risk to the public, police officers are relying on chance and hoping that wanted people happen to walk in front of a police camera.”
Lewisham Council said it was ‘carefully monitoring’ the use of facial recognition cameras and was in conversation with the Met and other local councils where the technology is being rolled out.
Lindsey Chiswick, who is responsible for the technology at the Met said: “Live facial recognition is a precise crime fighting tool which helps officers identify criminals as part of proactive intelligence led operations tackling crime across London.
“Where there is no match, all images are immediately and automatically destroyed. We understand the need to ensure sufficient safeguards are in place on our use of the technology and work closely with the London Policing Ethics Panel, set up by the mayor of London, to ensure this is the case.”
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel