A South London council’s plan to cut the allowance for its third-largest party leader has been called “a load of rubbish” and “corrupt” by councillors.
The proposal from the Conservative group also included increases to allowances in positions held largely by Conservative members.
Bromley Council’s ruling Conservative Group put forward a proposal to cut the £4,667 annual payment to the leader of the Liberal Democrats.
The plans were discussed at a general purposes committee meeting for Bromley Council on Thursday, February 16, as part of the draft council member allowances for the upcoming financial year.
Councillor Mike Jack, of Chislehurst Matters, said at the meeting that the plans were “a load of rubbish”.
Have you got a story for us? You can contact us here.
Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to keep up with all the latest news.
Sign up to our newsletters to get updates sent straight to your inbox.
He disagreed with the Conservative group’s reasoning behind the move, with Tory Councillor Simon Fawthrop saying that few other boroughs in Greater London paid an allowance to the leader of the second-largest opposition party.
Cllr Jack said: “I think it’s a poor excuse. I’m struggling with this whole concept of cutting the third party’s allowance.
"I think it’s morally not right. It’s corrupt… People don’t want to get into politics when they see things like this happening.
"It’s totally unacceptable. And I think your argument is not an argument – it’s morally not right.”
Tory Councillor Pauline Tunnicliffe said that there were only three other London boroughs that pay an allowance to the leader of the second-largest opposition party.
She said: “We find ourselves in the unusual situation of having two other representative parties in this council at the moment.
"So that added to the reasoning behind this, that if we give one then do we give a third or a fourth?”
It comes as increases to allowances in positions held primarily by Conservative members are also proposed.
Councillor Julie Ireland, leader of the Lib Dems Group, said: “I’m resentful particularly that the redistribution of the second [largest opposition group] leader’s allowance is going where it’s planned.
"I also would like to point out to members how dangerous the precedent is to allow one political party to punish another political party by interfering with members’ allowances.”
Cllr Fawthrop said at the meeting that the decision was not about any political party, at which opposition councillors laughed.
He said: “That was the rationale, bringing us in line with Greater London as a whole so it reflects what’s happening elsewhere, and as I said the vast majority of authorities in Greater London do not have second allowance for the third party.”
At the meeting, the committee voted to recommend the Conservative Group’s proposal, in a 7-6 vote.
The decision on council member’s allowances for the upcoming financial year will be decided at the full council meeting on February 27.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here