A watchdog has found no case to answer for a police officer who punched a 70-year-old man during a traffic stop.
Errol Dixon was stopped in Blyth Road, Bromley, south-east London, on September 13 last year, and was said to have been left with facial fractures after his encounter with police.
His daughter posted pictures of his injuries on Instagram, claiming he had been stopped for a broken brake light and alleging that officers “beat up my dad”.
Mr Dixon’s son David the News Shopper that his father’s face was “smashed to pieces”.
On Wednesday watchdog the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) found that the officer had no case to answer and that there was no evidence that they had committed a criminal offence.
The officer said that Mr Dixon, who was arrested on suspicion of assaulting an emergency services worker, had hit him in the face first.
IOPC investigators viewed body-worn video and took witness statements from Mr Dixon as well as the officer, who was interviewed under criminal caution; carried out house-to-house inquiries and viewed medical records.
The watchdog said: “At the conclusion of our investigation, in September 2022, we found the officer had no case to answer for their use of force in punching the man and there was no evidence that they may have committed a criminal offence.
“The evidence supported the officer’s statement that he believed the man posed a threat to him at the time and that he was acting in self-defence.
“Prior to punching the man in the face, the officer was, himself, struck in the face by the man and sustained an injury to his eye causing temporary loss of vision.
“We found that the officers at the scene had been polite and professional in their dealings with him before the man became antagonistic.
“In those circumstances, we found the force used was reasonable, justified and proportionate, given the man was aggressively resisting police.”
The watchdog also investigated a complaint that Mr Dixon had been discriminated against because of his race.
It found that there had been a legitimate reason to stop him because of the broken brake light, and no evidence to suggest he had been treated differently because of his race.
Have you got a story for us? You can contact us here.
Follow us on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram to keep up with all the latest news.
Sign up to our newsletters to get updates sent straight to your inbox.
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel